Poor quality hair loss treatments often have a negative effect on patients’ confidence and their faith in the hair loss industry as a whole. A bad hair transplant is outwardly obvious, most often worse than a naturally receding hairline and can be exceedingly embarrassing for the individual. The breadth of the Revision Hair Transplant depends on the extent of the previous surgery results. Other factors that can lead to unnatural results are hairline placement and symmetry, and graft placement/angle. Surgery performed on a patient who is too young can also adversely affect the outcome. .
With advancements in modern hair transplant surgery comes the ability for revision hair transplant to correct mistakes from past procedures. Revision hair transplant can rectify a number of issues from past procedures. If you had hair restoration surgery 20 or 30 years ago and are embarrassed by the unnatural “pluggy” look of an outdated procedure, modern techniques can smooth out your hairline. Revision hair transplant can also fix mistakes from past procedures, including unnatural looking hairlines or a noticeable amount of density in the transplant zones that doesn’t match the surrounding area. If you have noticeable scarring from past hair transplant procedures, particularly a FUT procedure, then revision hair transplant can help minimize the scarring. Healthy follicular units are typically harvested from the backs and sides of the scalp, leaving some patients with large bald spots. Ideally, the donor sites are easily covered with surrounding hair, but if done incorrectly, you may be left with scarring that just can’t be covered up. Revision hair transplant can be used to cover up scars to great effect.